Talk:ImageNet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Computer Vision Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Vision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer Vision on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer VisionWikipedia:WikiProject Computer VisionTemplate:WikiProject Computer VisionComputer Vision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wrong article title

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

All fo the sources given that are not self published (BBC, NYTimes, The Guardian)are actually for the contest. Thus the article should be named something like "ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge", not just Imagenet, as this on its own is non-notable. The contest is what gets all the recognition in the press.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ambiguous categories

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Where does [2] say the categories are ambiguous? (unsigned)

Hopefully my change addresses this issue. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

No such thing as attention or not. It's just a tool. No nerx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyhendg (talk • contribs) 05:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fei-Fei Li

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The history section of this article understates the role of Fei-Fei Li. I intend to improve it. HouseOfChange (talk) 20:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

How many Amazon mechanical turkers were involved in building ImageNet?

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The labor is hidden. 2601:40:C600:C68A:DDBE:2528:8173:BFDC (talk) 16:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic