 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
The quality of this article is horrible! Jwin74 (talk) 13:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)jwin
Yeah, it is definitely horrible. I removed the part about the record holder's win being a "photo finish". This is surely editorializing. I also removed the part about him dedicating to his childhood friend, who is in prison for a crime he claims not to have committed. If the record holder has his own wiki, which I do not believe he does, then that is where this information belongs. It has no place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.230.187 (talk) 21:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)