Talk:Ila Bêka

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mrbluefairy in topic Overlap with Beka & Lemoine page?

Possible COI

edit

I've tagged following this this edit, in which it appears that User:MeloPrino may be attempting to conceal his identity, as he works on articles about himself or his works. It is of course possible that the editor name MeloPrino may have been appropriated by someone else, but then it's problematic for a different reason. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ila Bêka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Overlap with Beka & Lemoine page?

edit

Hello fellow wikipedians! I noticed that there is quite a bit of overlap with the pages for Ila Beka, Louise Lemoine, and Bêka & Lemoine, especially with the filmography. Is this information best left in both articles, or should one article point to the other for this info?

Thank you!

--Mrbluefairy (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply