Talk:Il dolce suono... Ardon gl'incensi... Spargi d'amaro pianto
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 20 September 2007. The result of the discussion was merge/redirect to Lucia di Lammermoor. |
Request this article to be deleted ; no reason to improve edit
- I requested for this article to be deleted but yet, the request was "denied" when someone "undo" the delete tag with remarks below;
16:26, 18 September 2007 172.164.55.168 (Talk) (2,525 bytes) (deleting prod; not sure what editor means by not supposed to be in aria "content" If he/she means category, simply remove the category, not the article) (undo)
The action to undo was based on the remarks "not sure .....". Besides, where is the author if we really have to listen to 172.164.55.168? To me, when the author has abandoned an article without doing any good justification on why the article should existed in the first place, the article should be deleted especially when it is a redundant refer Il dolce suono. The author of this article, User:David Dawson wrote this on the 5 July 2006: so happen to be his first and last post.
This aria is for Lucia di Lammermoor, if anybody LOVES to keep this, it should be transfered to Lucia di Lammermoor synopsis for act 3. But if nobody wants to do anything about it because the content is confusing without any citation, it is best to be removed. I am currently doing update and cleanup for arias and I find this as "I dont know what to do with it". This is not an aria, not a synopsis.. so, please remove it or justify why it should be kept rather than keeping it just because somebody popped up and say "not sure what editor means by not supposed to be in aria "content" If he/she means category, simply remove the category, not the article". - Jay 08:03, 19 September 2007 (UTC)