Talk:Ikaris

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Ikaris' Powers

edit

I cleaned up the bit about his powers. If UtherSRG thinks it should be reverted, there should be discussion about which version is better. I didn't take out any of Ikaris' powers, just altered the wording. I guess Uther thinks that, as ad Admin, he is immune from punishment and can ignore the rules with impunity. 67.71.141.85 12:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you think I'm abusing my powers, then go work within the system. Meanwhile, you keep changing your IP so that you can avoid the block on your edit priviledges, so I am fully justified in reverting anything you do. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Not if it's not vandalism. I'll just keep changing it back. You've never won anything in your life, and that's not about to change anytime soon. 70.53.108.194 15:37, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
P.S. My IP changes on it's own anyway, it's nothing to do with me. Just a happy coincidence. 70.53.108.194 15:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Insults generally aren't the way to win friends or influence people. Dr Archeville 16:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Screw you! (Just kidding!) --El benito 21:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Neweternalsapocnow.png

edit
 

Image:Neweternalsapocnow.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:ETRNLSV2001.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ikaris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply