Talk:Icon Productions

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Laterthanyouthink in topic Changes of name and ownership in Australia and elsewhere

On what basis is The Last of the Mohicans listed as an Icon Productions film? The Icon Productions website does not list this movie, nor does the Internet Movie Database entry for this movie list Icon Productions. Nortonsf 12:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Icon Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

what does a production company do?

edit

I looked at the linked article for "Finding Fatimah". It says "Icon picked it up for theatrical distribution in 2017." British Muslim TV is listed as the producer. It would be helpful to say in the lede what Icon is now. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Icon Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:04, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Changes of name and ownership in Australia and elsewhere

edit

I've just updated the article according to what I stumbled upon when researching another article, as to the company's status in Australia. I don't have time to research the UK or US now and don't know what remains of the Icon name in those countries. Hopefully someone else will step in to update the rest? The infobox will need updating... and may even lead to a new article, if the Icon logo is only used in Australia now? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:13, 2 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure exactly what you want done, but we have templates to indicate problems (see Category:Cleanup templates). We generally don't include in-text warnings in our articles that the content might be wrong. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:34, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
You're right, of course NinjaRobotPirate. Thanks. I was tired and wanted to get rid of it ASAP at the time. Now I have just spent way too long digging into the various business changes and updated the article according to what I found (hopefully correct!). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)Reply