This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Ian Wanless is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Just a note saying that McKay appears to have been the subject's advisor while in graduate school, and this was the reason behind the COI taggging. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
It is true that Ian Wanless was my student almost 20 years ago. However, everything in the article is cited to a source independent of me and no concern has been raised about specific content. Without any explanation of why the article is problematic as it stands, the tag serves no purpose and I will remove it. McKay (talk) 05:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Its fine to remove the article tag, I was unsure which is why I left the note and placed the tag. I've added the connected contributor template to the talk page above for transparency sake. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
