Talk:Ian Cook (artist)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

References

edit

Linkedin is not okay to use in any circumstances. "a person generally knows about themselves" - that's right, but you shouldn't be using them as a reference. cook is a primary source, which is not okay to use.

you're contradicting yourself too. "that is probably ian correcting the facts". since "a person generally knows about themselves", why not let it stay? please this is not difficult; its basic. linkedin definitely no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yifek (talkcontribs) 20:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I get your point on LinkedIn and how Ian is a primary source and all that, but there are plenty of reliable sources from newspapers etc; why did you delete those? Newspapers aren't gossip (usually).
I am not contradicting myself. I reverted back to Ian's corrections after somebody else had reverted it. Look in the history properly. As a person generally knows about themselves, it can stay. So neither of us need now to edit the article on this matter. Rcsprinter (talk) 06:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ian Cook (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply