Not another ITV Channel Please!! There's some useful info on that ITV4 website if anyone gets the time to update this page. (I will do if I get the chance) --Hamdev Guru 14:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've made a start on a programming section. I must say, that logo looks much groovier than the blue and yellow. The JPS 15:15, 24 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

More4

edit

Anyone else think this was maybe rushed out to compete with More4?

No. Sky Three was rushed out to compete with the two of them, though. --Kiand 15:34, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it was rushed out, but it'll certainly be awful. ITV3 is awful, ITV2 is awful, ITV1 is completely awful.

Programmes on ITV4 - What should and shouldn't be included?

edit

As I look at my watchlist for the umpteenth time and see another revert of the article because someone has added programmes that may not be notable enough, I am starting a discussion on the British TV channels project to get a consensus on what is notable and what is not on a list of programmes.

The discussion is taking place here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British TV channels#Notable programmes on channel articles --tgheretford (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

List of programmes shown on ITV4

edit

I have created an article for you all to add a full list of programmes on the channel. List of programmes on ITV digital channels. I think it makes sense to have a seperate article, so as we don't clutter up this one. GMc 15:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Relevance of channel lists on articles

edit

There is currently a debate I started due to the deletion of a article which contains lists of notable programmes on ITV2/3/4. The discussion is here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British TV channels#Notable programmes on channel articles. --tgheretford (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

IT4 Website/Cleanup

edit

Itv 4 website shouldnt be included because it is not updated. Itv4 tv guide would be more useful. This website needs a cleanup. Look at FX (UK) this is more of a tidy site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.226.161 (talkcontribs) 14:01, 26 August 2006

I think we could lose that ident. It makes the page looks cluttered and is adding nothing to the article (fair use wise, then, it's useless). The JPStalk to me 14:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Clean up

edit

I've made some changes to the article because there were a lot of spelling mistakes and some of it didn't make any sense. It would be helpful if someone could check the technical details especially (eg about which channels ITV4 is broadcasting on) because I'm not sure about this and I'm hoping the intended meaning wasn't lost when I made the changes. JW 10:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Apart from some of the grammar in some places which I've just corrected, everything looks accurate. - Lee Stanley 13:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Placement of Logo for ITV4 HD section

edit

I'm not sure that it is appropriate to even have an Logo image in this section, but if it is, then it should appear with the text for this section, not disturbing the text flow of other sections. To accomplish this I created a table that fixed the text flow problem; deleting the table recreates the text flow problem.

This icon is unique to the topic of this section so that it may not belong in the Logos section, but I wouldn't object if someone moved it there. Softtest123 (talk) 18:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Does left-aligning the logo not fix it, rather than the table? -- [[ axg //  ]] 19:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Personalities

edit

I removed all but one personality from the section due to WP:LISTPEOPLE. I am not going to take the time to see if each and everyone of those people have a Wikipedia article; that is your responsibility if you add it. If the person does have an article and it wasn't linked, then feel free to re-add that person. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 01:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ITV4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ITV4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply