Talk:ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 36

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Requested move

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Pages to be moved. No opposes, and the request seems valid; the ISO website does indeed use the spacing proposed. Note: The pages haven't yet been moved as the targets are blacklisted. I have requested assistance with this at WP:AN. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 22:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

– The ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC XX scheme is consistent with other ISO and IEC TC and SC naming schemes on Wikipedia (see List of ISO technical committees and List of IEC technical committees). In addition, on both ISO and IEC websites, the stated format (JTC 1/SC XX) is used. LauraALo (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Support. Seems uncontroversial and there are some pages using the more official spacing e.g. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2. A potential issue seems to be that the combination of slashes and spaces may be more confusing to the reader, but that's basically the official name of these things e.g. [1].Someone not using his real name (talk) 09:48, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

COI declaration and revision summary

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am an editor affiliated with the American National Standards Institute and JTC 1. I have made substantial edits to this article including a rearrangement of the article for a more clear and simple organization of the page. I created a "Published standards" section which includes important, select standards rather than the complete set. In addition to external liaisons, I have added internal liaisons, under the section entitled "Collaborations." I have also added a list of the member countries of SC 36 under the section "Member countries." I moved the working group titles and terms of reference to the section "Structure" rather than dividing the standards by working group and placing each WG's terms of reference there. I have also added some brief historical background to the lead. Please feel free to provide me with feedback about any of the changes I have made to this article, or to any other articles I have contributed to. LauraALo (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic