Talk:IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation

IETF drafts

There is a template on Wikipedia for citing IETF drafts, and it is not for the IETF to say who can use their material for what. Certainly the draft is at least a good source for the statement "there was as draft for such-and-such a proposal". -- Rmrfstar (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

They set standards for the entire Internet too. Drafts are not permissible references. Kbrose (talk) 19:43, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand your reasoning. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 20:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Blanking

I think there is plenty of material on this subject to warrant a Wikipedia article. If there is insufficient context provided now, I will add more. -- Rmrfstar (talk) 04:28, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

NAT66

I thought that IPv6 to IPv6 was NAT66 and that it was NAT64 that had stateless and stateful options. Should all occurences of NAT66 be NAT64 and the title include in brackets NAT66 as a synonym? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas04072003 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)