| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the IIG Capital article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by 73.149.234.53 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment: Does not meet notability guidelines. No significant, independent coverage. The book references are mostly a company profile / marketing listing for their trade financing business. It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2020-04-10 with the comment: Assertion of notability on this talk page. Additional news source [1] |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability?
editIt seems odd that a company that has financed $7.5B in trade finance transactions and is a major tenant at 1500 Broadway would have its notability in question. I'm not sure what the guideline for removing the notability box is, but if there's a discussion to be had I'd like to start it here by voting in favor of demonstrated notability on the strength of the company's global reach, importance to trade finance, and documented scale of transactions closed. Thomas Craven 01:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcraven (talk • contribs)
- @Tcraven:, I have removed the notability tag. I believe with the new articles regarding the ponzi scheme and some IPO's the company is notable. ~RAM (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)