Talk:IBM zEnterprise System
Latest comment: 5 years ago by MartinPackerIBM in topic Should zBX be rewritten to use the past tense?
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The contents of the IBM zEnterprise System page were merged into IBM Z#IBM zEnterprise System on 20 June 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Should the z13 and z14 stuff be moved to separate pages?
editNeither the z13 nor the z14 are referred to by IBM as "zEnterprise" systems, and at least some of the "zEnterprise" systems' predecessors, the System z9 and System z10, have pages of their own.
There's no need for this page to mention every z/Architecture machine since the first "zEnterprise" system; we already have IBM System z, which covers all the z/Architecture machines starting with the "IBM eServer zSeries" - no need for this page to track that page. Guy Harris (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Should zBX be rewritten to use the past tense?
editI'd argue that as zBX can't be attached to z15 references to it and URM should use the past tense. Further some "end of Marketing" point should be made.