Talk:I-Generation Superstars of Wrestling

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I-Generation Superstars of Wrestling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal I-Generation Superstars of Wrestling is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	I-Generation Superstars of Wrestling is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pay per view in US? edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

Absolutely not. This was never shown on pay per view.

This show sounds like one of those thrown together with stars trying to fit in with a promoter who didn't know what they were doing.

It's notability and verifiability is highly questionable. 60.230.6.32 05:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually, yes it was: [1], [2]. Do you have any proof otherwise? TJ Spyke 06:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is original research I admit, but I have a friend in the US who has never heard of this pay per view. And he has watched all of them in the US since 1998 (WWF/E, WCW, TNA and everything else). The source you gave looks like garbage to be honest. We have a clear clash here. I still severely query the notability of the promotion. Maybe not the show though - maybe it should be listed on WP as a show and not a promotion. !! Justa Punk !! 10:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

PS - I must have been signed out before and didn't realise it!! That was me by the way above (the 60 IP). !! Justa Punk !! 10:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

It was aired on PPV. I can't 100% gurantee it was in the US (although the second source I mentioned is reliable from my past experience), but it was aired on PPV at least in Australia. There have been several PPV's I had never heard of until I started doing research for my PPV Win-Loss Records project (let me know if you want a copy), like the Heroes of Wrestling PPV or the World Wrestling Legends PPV (both of which did air on US PPV). TJ Spyke 17:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No it was definitely not on pay per view in Australia. The only wrestling pay per views here were WWF/E, WCW, TNA, World Wrestling All-Stars and NWA when they had the weeklies on (we saw them monthly for 12 months in 2003). I used to work for Main Event who is the sole provider here. !! Justa Punk !! 22:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed up - and WP logged me out again! WTF? !! Justa Punk !! 10:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure you have your references set to keep you logged in? If not, you will automatically log off. TJ Spyke 21:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure is! That's why I said "WTF?" !! Justa Punk !! 07:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic