Talk:Hypertension/GA2

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jmh649

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  1. This page is way to technical. It is also over linked. Why say epistaxis when nose bleed would do fine as does not need linking?
  2. There are many refs grouped together when all that is needed is one good reference. Looking back at the previous GA assessment a number of aspects did not pass.
  3. There still remains many issue such as the absence of a discussion of hypertension emergencies / urgencies.
  4. Will review more completely if anyone is still interested...

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply