Talk:Hygrophorus eburneus/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Rcej in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Fine article! Two things:
- Mention the bioactivity and *cough*slimeaceous*cough* edibility in the lead.
Results of review edit
The article Hygrophorus eburneus passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass