Talk:Hyaenodon
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Digitigrade or Plantigrade? edit
Er, didn't creodonts have plantigrade feet, like mice and humans? I've added a note to the picture's caption.12.144.50.194 (talk) 22:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- I have no reference for this.--Altaileopard (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Skull-Image edit
I am not shure if the skull in the taxobox is really a Hyaenodon. At google sholar I can find only Cynohyaenodon cayluxi. I am not shure if both are identical.--Altaileopard (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- You seem to be right about that. Maybe an article about the other genus could be started. FunkMonk (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Altai- I added some recent reference to the main page, which include a discussion of the digitigrade feet of Hyaenodon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CT yanqui (talk • contribs) 13:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, I will show you now, how to add a reference more properly--Altaileopard (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, that reference was about the topic above I think... Than we should not place it under references. I will paste it here until someone writes something about the "digitigradism" of Hyaenodon. But anyways: thanks.
- Mellett, J.S. (1977) Paleobiology of North American Hyaenodon. Contrib. Vert. Evol., no. 1, 134 pp.
- Ah, that reference was about the topic above I think... Than we should not place it under references. I will paste it here until someone writes something about the "digitigradism" of Hyaenodon. But anyways: thanks.
- Okay, I will show you now, how to add a reference more properly--Altaileopard (talk) 14:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Mellett, J.S. (1969) Carnassial rotation in a fossil carnivore. Amer. Midland Natur., 82:287-289.
- --Altaileopard (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Morphology edit
"others were only of the size of a marten" How big is that? The Marten entry does not say. Perhaps it would be better to use a more commonly known animal for comparison or to make sure the thing to which it is being compared has an entry that allows one to look it up. Better still, how about giving a length/weight range?98.121.92.169 (talk) 11:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- which I see it does furthur down. Still, I think the comparison could be tweaked by someone with good knowledge for those of us without. 98.121.92.169 (talk) 11:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
