Talk:Hwaeomsa
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hwaeomsa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151220001533/http://eng.templestay.com/reservation/temple_view.asp?cid=9&idx=27 to http://eng.templestay.com/reservation/temple_view.asp?cid=9&idx=27
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312185106/http://english.tour2korea.com/03Sightseeing/DestinationsByRegions/Depth04.asp?sight=Sightseeing&Sightseeing_ID=230&Address_1=32863&Address_2=30914&konum=1&kosm=m2_1 to http://english.tour2korea.com/03Sightseeing/DestinationsByRegions/Depth04.asp?sight=Sightseeing&Sightseeing_ID=230&Address_1=32863&Address_2=30914&konum=1&kosm=m2_1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
The Disrespectful Behavior Towards Privacy edit
The total disregard of a “private” conversation between a monk and one of their esteem guest is appalling. Writing an article about what was said within the trust of a low key discussion is terrible. Shame on those who encourage this behavior and on that monk who felt entitled. Gossiping is never okay and apparently they had nothing better to do with their time. 66.27.161.10 (talk) 18:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)