Talk:Hussein Saeed/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Hashima20 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  18:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The first paragraph of the early life section needs a citation
    "Since then, Iraq was not able to qualify to the World Cup" - this too needs a source
    " Saeed played all the 630 minutes of Iraq's 7 matches" - missing full stop
    " One of the documents even showed him and Al-Badri executing a mission" - remove 'even', sounds informal
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Just a few minor issues to address, but other than this the article is looking great. On hold   JAGUAR  18:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

The issues pointed out in the (It is reasonably written well) section are now solved. Hashima20 (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, this looks ready to be promoted now.   JAGUAR  19:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Really appreciate it! Hashima20 (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply