Talk:Hurva Synagogue/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GAR soon.Pyrotec (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

GAR

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   A very readable article

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   A good number of sources provided

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   A Good Article.

Congratulations on this article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 15:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)