Talk:Hurting the feelings of the Chinese people

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Remsense in topic Seems distinctly OR

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama have all been accused of hurting the feelings of the Chinese people?
    Source 20 (Wired): "China is growling about President Clinton's plans to meet next week with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama. To do so, a Foreign Ministry spokesman said, would be to "support (the Dalai Lama's) activities, which seriously hurt the feelings of the Chinese people.""
    Source 21 (Hindustan Times): "Liu said Bush's meeting with the Tibetan spiritual leader, one day before the Dalai Lama receives a congressional Gold Medal, "seriously violates the fundamental rules of international relations, hurts the Chinese people's feelings and grossly interferes in China's internal affairs.""
    Source 22 (Xinhua): "China pointed out that the U.S. obstinate arrangement of President Obama's meeting with the Dalai Lama in the White House has seriously interfered in China's internal affairs, hurt the feelings of the Chinese people, undermined China's key interests and damaged the Sino-American relations, said the press release"
    Source 23 (Quartz): "After president Barack Obama met the Dalai Lama in 2010, China issued a statement calling the meeting “a serious interference in China’s internal affairs that hurt the feelings of the Chinese people, hurts China’s core interests and hurts Sino-US relations.”"

Created by Benlisquare (talk). Self-nominated at 14:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:   - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   ALT2 is best, imo. Most people won't know what "People's Daily" is. (t · c) buidhe 02:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Horng-luen Wang article edit

2016 re-print version of 汪宏倫's journal article:

  • 理解當代中國民族主義:制度、情感結構與認識框架 ISBN 978-986-04-8108-2

Regards, --benlisquareTCE 05:55, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seems distinctly OR edit

While there is secondary coverage of this phraseology, it feels like the article takes liberties to fill in the rest with potential OR or failing that, undue examples. I'm trying to imagine a version of this article about an editorial tic of a particular Western media outlet—and while that theoretical article seems plausible, it would also have more grouchy editors contesting its scope. I'm that grouch here, I guess. Remsense 23:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply