Talk:Hurricane Teddy
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Teddy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:54, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Edit warring edit
Same as with Delta's images, this is unacceptable. I've locked the page for three days until it can be figured out. @Destroyeraa and MarioProtIV: discuss what to do with the images on the talk page and not through edit summaries. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 22:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Mario has consistently reverted my edits with the reason "flawed logic" on Delta, Dorian, and now Teddy without providing any evidence. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 22:35, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Fine, then how about to satisfy both of us, we use this and colorize it and use it? It was during peak when winds were 140 mph. I don’t like edit warring but sometimes the reasons come off as just confusing when looking at it carefully, and when we generally had an good image up for a long time without any issues. Hope this makes sense. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 23:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC) @Hurricaneboy23: Do you want to cause more edit warring? We already discussed it on the talk page and this was deemed the closest to the peak intensity. I don't want to revert the image anymore. It's simple - this image doesn't suck and is the closest (35 min from) peak intensity. Please leave it. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 16:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 19 October 2020 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Revert 1 edit by Destroyeraa to last revision by MarioProtIV. @Cyclonebiskit and Jason Rees: as I agree to go with the other party's ideas, the edit warring has stopped and the page should be unprotected. I agree to stop edit-warring with the images on this page, and I think Mario agrees to do the same. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 23:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Done and protection removed. Thank you for being quick about this. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 02:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Cyclonebiskit and MarioProtIV: Thank you. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 12:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)