Talk:Hurricane Ione

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Hurricane Ione
Good articleHurricane Ione has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Ione is part of the 1955 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 2, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 21, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Todo edit

An external links section, better intro, more impact. Jdorje 20:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Expand edit

If anyone plans to expand this soon, here's a good article from the TIME archives. – Chacor 08:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

It is surprisingly skimpy and needs some TLC. Its rainfall image has been added. Thegreatdr 06:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'll adopt this article. – Chacor 01:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

A new parent has begun making changes. Thegreatdr (talk) 07:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BL059FA.jpg edit

 

Image:BL059FA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BL059FA.jpg edit

 

Image:BL059FA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Good article nomination on hold edit

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of March 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Needs citations in lead section
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: I see that two images were deleted for not having a fair-use rationale. If any other images are found, be sure to use one.


Another overall good article.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Added citations to lead. As for images, when Ione images are found, they will be added to the article. It's hard to find imagery for a 1955 hurricane. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I will pass it tomorrow morning. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 04:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Successful good article nomination edit

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of March 9, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: See above

Great job on the article, I am now considering joining WP:WPTC after working with it. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Ione. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Hurricane Ione edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hurricane Ione's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Canada":

  • From Hurricane Frederic: Environment Canada (September 14, 2010). "1979-Frederic". Canadian Storm Impact Summaries. Government of Canada. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
  • From Hurricane Fiona: "Update: Body of missing Port aux Basques woman displaced during Hurricane Fiona is recovered". Royal Canadian Mounted Police. September 25, 2022. Retrieved 25 September 2022.
  • From 1953 Atlantic hurricane season: Canadian Hurricane Centre (2010-11-09). "1953-Barbara". Archived from the original on 2012-08-13. Retrieved 2021-02-19.
  • From Hurricane Ella (1978): Canadian Hurricane Centre (2010-09-14). "1978-Ella". Retrieved 2010-11-01.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply