Talk:Hurricane Ileana (2006)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am going to be reviewing this page which is currently up for Good Article Nomination, I will have the full review up within a few hours. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Expand the lead and needs an overall copyedit.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Expand the Impact section, it's too short. Check Spanish sources for reports of damages.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of its affects would be nice. If one cannot be found, an image relating to the storm during its development/dissipation would also be good.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I am putting this article on hold to allow you to address these points. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Since no attempt has been made to improve this article. I am failing it. Please address the issues above before nominating this article agian. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)