Talk:Hurricane Humberto (2001)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Hurricanehink in topic GA Review
 | Hurricane Humberto (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Humberto (2001)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –Grondemar 03:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
I did a general copyedit, and fixed a couple of misstated facts, such as the fact that Humberto is actually on the 2013 hurricane list, not the 2011 list. Otherwise, this article in my opinion meets the GA criteria.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- GA PASS. Congratulations!
- Pass/Fail:
Thanks, and sorry for taking so long. –Grondemar 04:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Great, thanks a lot! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)