Talk:Hurricane Henriette (2007)

Todo

More info. Storm05 11:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

What more do you want to see? Seddon69 20:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

More preparations and impact would be good. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

TCR

[1] --Ajm⁸¹ 22:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Henriette (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   In the Storm history and Preparations and impact section, it would be best to add the year the Hurricane took effect.

   Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

   In the Storm history section, it would be best if "August 30" and "Mexico" were linked once, per here. Also, "31 August" should be fixed to "August 31".

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!

--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The changes needed were fairly minor, so I just went ahead and added the year to the Storm history and Preparations section. About the links, dates can be linked more than once, so they become autoformatted. Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 22:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that :) Hopefully that dealt with any issues. Seddσn ^{talk Editor Review} 09:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Really? I guess these date formats are indeed changing. Alright, I'll take your word. Congrats, you know have a GA in your midst. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Henriette (2007)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs a bit more U.S. impact. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 22:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 22:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)