Talk:Hurricane Florence (1994)
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Cyclonebiskit in topic GA Review
 | Hurricane Florence (1994) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Florence (1994)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi, I will be assessing Hurricane Florence --Elena85 1959 Pacific Hurricane Season 22:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- Is good and contains a brief storm history.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- Checks out okay!
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Works out well
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- Good
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
Yes
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- I've Passed the article, it is great! --Elena85 1959 Pacific Hurricane Season 23:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- P.S.- I am a fast reader if you are wondering why I did this so quick.
- Wow, very fast, 5 min. :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)