Talk:Hunting strategy

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Someguy75849482 in topic article rewrite

Requested move edit

The reasons for move copied from the entry on the WP:RM page

Voting edit

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support As per Wikipedia page naming conventions 1.1, "capitalization of entries." - MPD 00:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, as per User:MPD- NickelShoe 18:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Page was moved by Marudubshinki on 31 December 2005 --Lox (t,c) 18:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Subject matter edit

Is this a list of methods for hunting animals, military tactics, or assassination methods? It seems to include a bunch, and it cites no sources for any of the entries in the list. --Maru (talk) Contribs 04:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Seconded! And many aspects of hunting animals are not covered here, so it's also quite patchy. Is "hunting" the best way to describe the military and assassination tactics described here? --TheGrappler 19:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Third. I'm going to delete them. Toiyabe 17:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am going to remove any remaining content that is military or assassination in nature and further elaborate on wildlife hunting techniques.I am also going to change the format so that it is not just a bulleted list. Hnmccraw2 (talk) 15:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mimicry for humans? edit

Of course, other animals hunt. The article aggressive mimicry doesn't speak of human hunters. Unless it mentions humans hunting with this technique, it shouldn't be cited in this article.

Kortoso (talk) 20:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
I took the initiative to remove it since it wasn't in the source. To be honest, mimicry has been occasionally used by humans, but without a reference, it's best to leave it out for now. Kortoso (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Can we add Persistence Hunting? edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistence_hunting

It seems like it would fit. 69.58.248.1 (talk) 16:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

article rewrite edit

noticed this article is pretty confusing and sorta inaccurate Someguy75849482 (talk) 00:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply