Talk:Humanitarian corridor

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Disaster management Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It reminds me of the free speech zone. A place for people who want to act normal for a bit.

What kind of sources do you plan to use?

Stuff like this?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/03/turkey-syria-humanitarian-aid.html

84.106.26.81 (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deprod edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Companion to International Humanitarian Law discusses this subject over at least three pages from pp. 390–. SpinningSpark 13:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure it does. But IHL covers very many topics and I don't think they all warrant an article. Anyway, I don't have strong views on it, I just felt this one (a few sentences, one reference) didn't meet the bar. I think the delete suggestion just needed one objection to cease, so I guess that's the end of that process. CT55555 (talk) 14:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disadvantages edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why is there a section for disadvantages (with two citations) that doesn’t say what the disadvantages are? Louie Mantia (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think this section should be deleted. I worked on it before and it has some wild original research about how corridors could be used for nefarious purposes, but it was cited with bad sources and I don't think it deserves to be part of this article. CT55555 (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think that’s a good solution. I’m not sure it’s worth keeping, especially in its current state. Louie Mantia (talk) 16:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic