Talk:Human male sexuality
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Human male sexuality article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 29 November 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cguy1. Peer reviewers: Ktashkulov, HanaIverson.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Section on asexuality? edit
Do you guys think there should be a section on asexuality? For a top-importance article on sexuality, I was surprised that before my edit today, there was no mention of it in the article (besides the template.) The same thing was/is missing for the human female sexuality article. Paradox Marvin (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- There would need to be sources specifically connecting asexuality to male sexuality in particular, discussing how it specifically applies to men. Most sources on sexual orientation do not discuss it, focusing on the presence and direction of sexuality, so WP:DUE is a concern. Crossroads -talk- 18:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Was the Kinsey book I linked not about male sexuality? I'm pretty sure it was. Paradox Marvin (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course it is, but you'd have to point out where exactly it speaks of asexuality. The Kinsey Reports are also not an ideal source per WP:RS AGE and WP:MEDRS (which also speaks of age). Also, any material on asexuality shouldn't go under a "homosexuality" section. Crossroads -talk- 07:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah okay, I wasn't aware that it wasn't a good source. I put it under homosexuality because it mentioned bisexuality too so I thought it would just be a catch-all section for different sexual orientations. Thanks for helping me out! Paradox Marvin (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course it is, but you'd have to point out where exactly it speaks of asexuality. The Kinsey Reports are also not an ideal source per WP:RS AGE and WP:MEDRS (which also speaks of age). Also, any material on asexuality shouldn't go under a "homosexuality" section. Crossroads -talk- 07:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Was the Kinsey book I linked not about male sexuality? I'm pretty sure it was. Paradox Marvin (talk) 19:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Human male sexuality edit
Hello why is not the name male Human sexuality? I am wondering, on the ground that this topic is a branch of "Human sexuality", so the word male comes as a second adjective. Abu aamir (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)