Talk:Hull Daily Mail

Debate over disputes and scandals section

The editor of the "disputes and scandals" section states his own opinion when he refers to “smears and harassment” and “insinuations". It would be better, for example, to write "The Hull Daily Mail ran a series of articles ... which were criticised by ..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by LincsWolds (talk • contribs) 20:24, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).

(Ignore second part as you are not new!)Shortfatlad (talk) 12:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Shortfatlad - appreciate it. Altered tone to reflect Wikipedia neutrality guidelines; added link to Facebook group 'I bet I can get 50,000 people to boycott the Hull Daily Mail'; removed unreferenced material RE Gwenap and Pulse & Cocktails; removed disputed neutrality tag; removed stub tag. LincsWolds (talk) 17:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hull Daily Mail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071101072315/http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/AWARDS/031128york.shtml to http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/AWARDS/031128york.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071101072321/http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/AWARDS/041111york.shtml to http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/AWARDS/041111york.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517022606/http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=36382&sectioncode=1 to http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=36382&sectioncode=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214075416/http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/awards/071126yorkaward.shtml to http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/awards/071126yorkaward.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)