Talk:How We Do (Party)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I have quite a bit of time, so it is ideal to get on with this large GAN! --K. Peake 07:11, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Infobox looks good!
• The lead single part should be a sentence after writing/production, however keep the inclusion on her album in the first sentence but remove wikilink on studio album
• Lowercase the Monarch and the Runners per MOS:THEMUSIC
• "from Notorious B.I.G.'s single "Party and Bullshit" (1993), it" → "from the Notorious B.I.G.'s "Party and Bullshit", it" with the wikilink
• Maybe remove the on the floor part since that is a bit much detail for the lead; if not then reword to be less repetitive
• Move the critical reception sentence to being in the first para because this lead can be cut down to two
• The Japan position needs to be written out in prose since everything in the lead does
• The North American performance sentence is out of order; place the Hot 100 first, followed by the Dance Club Songs chart and Canada
• "It attained a gold certification by" → "It attained gold certifications by" and mention the countries all of these were in
• Remove the 140,000 units part since that is not notable here
• ""How We Do (Party)" received moderate response from Music critics, with some applauding the song's music and sound, and others comparing" → "The song received moderate responses from music critics, who mostly applauded the music and sound, while others compared"
• Merge the third para with the second one
• Remove "for the song" after accompanying music video because this implies that
• Changed the uploaded to her channel part to merely released per too much detail for the lead
• I'm not sure if among others is appropriate language or if the sentence is even useful when only two reviewers are included, also the lipstick is not mentioned by any of them
• "including the The Jonathan Ross Show," → "including The Jonathan Ross Show,"

Background and composition

• The writing and production should come first, as this obviously happens before release
• Remove the comma before Ora
• "Several remixes, including by" → "Several remixes, including ones by"
• Lowercase the Monarch and the Runners per MOS:THEMUSIC
• "Musically, it is a" → "Musically, "How We Do (Party)" is a" also, make this the sentence before the vocal range since genre is most significant and start a new para for comp
• Mention along with the love interest part that she sings over acoustic guitar with the wikilink

Critical reception

• "was met with moderate response" → "was met with moderate responses"
• "partying, empowerment, and romance."" → "partying, empowerment, and romance"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "from the same website, opined that" → "from the same website opined that"
• Italicise GQ
• "commended its appeal as a" → "commended the song's appeal as"
• "For Digital Spy, Robert Copsey declared it a" → "For Digital Spy, Robert Copsey declared the song a"
• The song years are not in the quote so either add using [] or separate from the author's words, also don't use speech marks inside ones
• Italicise MusicOMH
• Why does The Washington Post quote use a comma when the source uses a dash?

Commercial performance

• Are you sure the Czech Republic position is notable for prose?
• Mention the New Zealand Singles Chart by name
• Mention the respective countries it was awarded those certifications in
• Name the chart as the Hot 100 rather than the Hot 100 Singles
• "the Dance Club Songs and" → "the Dance Club Songs chart and"

Music video

• Shouldn't the img say lipstick rather than lips per the source?
• Only use the word official once in the opening sentence
• "perform along to the song" are you sure this is appropriate language?
• "while using their torsos" → "where she uses their torsos"
• Simply write American singers before both of the compared artists since that is their identity
• "Evans and Stefani."" → "Evans and Stefani"." per MOS:QUOTE
• "As of Lansky, from the aforementioned website," → "For the aforementioned website's Lansky,"
• "red lips and" → "red lipstick and"

Live performances

• Remove the opening sentence since this single para mentions a 2013 performance
• "On 1 May, she performed" → "On 1 May 2012, Ora performed"
• "In the following" what is this supposed to mean?
• Identify as BBC Radio 1's Hackney Weekend
• "On 18 August," → "On 18 August 2012,"
• Mention that the Jingle Bell Ball performance of the song was a closer
• "on 17 September" → "on 17 September 2012"

Copyright infringement suit

• Maybe this should be merged with the above section since they are only one para each and title something like Live performances and controversy?

• Wouldn't that part fit better at the 'Background and composition' or 'Critical reception' section? Iaof2017 (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Lowercase the Last Poets and the Notorious B.I.G. per MOS:THEMUSIC
• Remove the release year of "Party and Bullshit" because it is mentioned earlier in the article
• "published and distributed" → "publish[ed] and distribute[d]" per the source
• "except his permission." → "without his permission."
• ""challenge and encourage people to not waste" → ""challenge[] and encourage[] people to NOT waste"
• "the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York judge" → "the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York judge" per MOS:US
• Surround 'to something glorified' with singular quotation marks

Track listing

• Good

Charts

Weekly charts

• CIS should not be piped to the country
• Wikilink Euro Digital Song Sales to itself per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Remove Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles and Radio Songs per WP:USCHARTS

Year-end charts

• Good

Certifications

• Good

Release history

• Label → Label(s)

See also

• List of number-one dance singles of 2012 (United States) → List of Billboard Dance Club Songs number ones of 2012 with the pipe

References

• Copyvio score looks too high at 44.8%; cut down quoting from ref 7 to fix this
• Wikilink Spotify on ref 3
• Wikilink Digital Spy on ref 13
• Cite MusicOMH as work/website instead on ref 15
• Official Charts → Official Charts Company on ref 17 with the wikilink
• Cite Complex as work/website instead on refs 44 and 49, piping to Complex (magazine) per MOS:LINK2SECT
• Remove or replace ref 45 since that is not a reliable source

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 11:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Hello @Kyle Peake: thank you for this somewhat longer review. I've responded to all of your concerns! Iaof2017 (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Iaof2017 Upon further consideration, I believe that critical and commercial reception should be one section since they are only a para each, also see MOS:LINK2SECT to understand that you wikilink Euro Digital Song Sales. --K. Peake 14:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Kyle Peake Done. Wouldn't it be better to merge 'Music video' and 'Live performances' into one 'Promotion' section? Iaof2017 (talk) 16:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

• Iaof2017 ✓ Pass now, honestly I feel those are better set apart since the first is two paras. --K. Peake 07:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you again for the review. :D Iaof2017 (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)