Talk:House of Cosbys/Archive 1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Technical 13 in topic External links semi request
Archive 1

External links "The Episodes and Statement on Cease and Desist order at Channel 101." should be changed to link to http://www.channel101.com/show/148

  Done I've updated the link to the Episode list and cleaned up the formatting a little. Episode list and statement to Wall St. Journal are now on separate lines as they are separate things. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 16:37, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Untitled

Looks like http://www.barrettj.com/files/house_of_cosbys_5.mp4 , in the References, is dead. 69.157.173.149 (talk) 05:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Cosby is a public figure and is fair game. His lawyers must know this and are just using intimidation tactics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.13.194.15 (talkcontribs)

Channel 101 and Waxy.org still host the videos, so I assume that you're right. The stupid thing is that these people were real fans of his and doing him a good deal of publicity (fans = sales = $$$$), who are now pissed off enough to make Episode 5. I think they shot themselves in the foot with that one. --h2g2bob 12:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
These are hilarious and its a shame that they were put to an end —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.58.18 (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Houseofcosbys.jpg

 

Image:Houseofcosbys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

There is quite a bit of vandalism going on to this article, and any corrections are often undone by the vandals. Quite a few characters that didn't exist in the show have been added to the list, and comments on the theme music and legal troubles are made useless by a couple of factually incorrect additions. This article might be a good candidate for requiring a user account to edit as the vandalism is all done by anonymous users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmk9561 (talkcontribs) 10:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes, as stupid as it sounds, this article should clearly be restricted. The volume of vandalism here is absurd. I second the motion to require a user account to edit this page Superwesman (talk) 19:32, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Need sauce for a lot of the clones' numbers. --IraJacobs (talk) 22:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Bong Warrior has a very truncated sense of humor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.107.232 (talk) 23:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

There isn't no such thing as no 'Urban Dictionary Cosby' up in here - Bongwarrior on an Episode of "Retards Say the Darndest Things" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.69.253.5 (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)