This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
I proposed deletion of this article with a PROD tag, with the following concern: "Subject not notable: no content unique to this particular company and article is not likely to expand; article amounts to an advert."
The prod was deleted by IP user 91.154.73.118 with the following edit summary: "Certainly not spam".
To keep this article, we need to establish that the subject is notable, and at present I am having trouble seeing what's notable about it. Horze is a company selling horse equipment: there are thousands of those, and we can't have articles for all of them. What's so special about this one? A bare assertion that the article is "not spam" is not nearly enough – we need to know why it is not. Richard New Forest (talk) 09:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)Reply