Talk:Horten brothers

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Gjxj in topic why emphasis on pilots?

"Revolutionary stealth" edit

"Its revolutionary stealth design included a special carbon layer that was able to reduce the radar range detection." I'd like to see this and other sweeping statements in the article justified and referenced.86.42.190.120 (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nope. No carbon layer in the Ho-229 edit

The National Air & Space Museum extensively analyzed the structure of the Ho-229--they have the sole remaining example currently in their restoration shop--with digital microscopes and sophisticated spectrometry and concluded that there is NO carbon or charcoal between the layers of plywood. (You can find it all on the NASM's dedicated Horten 229 site, in the chapter headed, "Was It Stealthy?") What seems to be charcoal/carbon is simply tiny chunks of oxidized wood. Which, indeed, you could say is the same thing as charcoal, but it does mean that the Hortens had nothing to do with it. Only the passage of time did.173.62.11.254 (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Date of death edit

Is the date of death of one of the brothers 1993 or 1994? the article mentions bother years in different parts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.101.221 (talk) 22:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horten brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horten brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

why emphasis on pilots? edit

Shouldn't 'aircraft designers' be right in the lede sentence?? I may just fix that unless I'm missing something. Gjxj (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply