Talk:Hoplophoneus

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canine length edit

And... How much long were it's fangs aproximately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.48.226.60 (talk)

Body length edit

Just to compare, their principal measurment, length I guess or height if you prefer, what was it? long were it's fangs aproximately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.48.226.60 (talk)

copying word for word, not a good idea. edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://www.messybeast.com/cat-prehistory.htm

Read the section on Hoplophoneus. Copying things word for word without citing your sources is called plagiarism. At least provide a link to the website that you copied from.

Thanks for nothing, ~The Phantom Sheet Whistler

i.e. The Phantom Sheet Whistler is a phrase taken from the cover of the Small Faces album, Ogden's Nutgone Flake. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.8.175.18 (talk)

I've deleted the copyright violation. The editor who originally added this content, User:N.i. has already been permanently blocked (for who knows what). Thank you for pointing out the problem here. — coelacan talk — 06:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nimravinae? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article says the genus belongs to the subfamily Nimravinae, whereas the wiki article on the family Nimravidae says it belongs to the subfamily Hoplophoninae. Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glevum (talk • contribs) 22:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect Range edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1671/0272-4634%282000%29020%5B0157%3AENCFT%5D2.0.CO%3B2?journalCode=vrpa

states that its fossils have been discovered and described from Thailand, Asia. Here the range is limited to North America only. Should be rectified. Asheekay (talk) 15:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hoplophoneus/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Strengths: none

Weaknesses: compare with sentences seen about Hoplophoneus on: http://www.messybeast.com/cat-prehistory.htm

Thats right, they are copied straight from the page.

Last edited at 07:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 18:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic