Talk:Hope for the Hills

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

CPUC and TRTP edit

I included a section that would outline the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) involvement in the case. This section gives a timeline of the CPUC’s press releases from 2009-2012 that included its approval of construction and it decision to stop-work of Southern California Edison’s Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project. The City of Chino Hills was able to submit an Application for Rehearing and Motion for Partial Stay in order to temporarily halt the construction of the transmission towers, which was a pivotal part in Hope for the Hill’s pursuit to stop production. Annierc (talk) 00:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hope for the Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply