Talk:Hong Kong Air Cadet Corps

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former good article nomineeHong Kong Air Cadet Corps was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 23, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Needs footnotes edit

This article needs to footnote its content with references. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalisim edit

recently, ip address 69.212.23.92 (traced back to Milwaukee,Wisconsin (USA) has vandalised the page, as part of WPHK, we should do our best to stop them) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toyotaboy95 (talkcontribs) 11:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Failed GA edit

This artilce has failed GA, the first thing that comes to mind is a lack of references. Only 4 exist

  • The article has a lot of sentences "if you...". It is not an encyclopedic style to write in a way that talks 1-1 to the reader.
  • Too much of the article is in list form and not displayed as prose.
  • Fiar use images need a specific rationale for use
  • "They are very strict with standards" - who said this -> unsourced POV. need a source else it is personal commentary
  • 80% of hte article is a list of dot points
  • The lead is not a summary of the main body but instead introduces new info that is not repeated in the bottom.
  • There is no info on the history of the group, and the budget of the group and so forth.
  • Most of the article is a list of rank and a set of customs. Not much of the article discusses what the activities, camps etc that teh group does. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Hongkongsar.jpg edit

 

Image:Hongkongsar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Air Cadet Uniform (HK).gif edit

 

Image:Air Cadet Uniform (HK).gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regimental quickmarch edit

"We're No' Awa' Tae Bide Awa" appears to be used quite extensively per the extant media coverage, pretty much to the exclusion of any other tunes. knoodelhed (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

IJBDD, please stop adding copyrighted and promotional content edit

IJBDD, please stop copy-pasting content from other websites into Wikipedia. That is called a copyvio, and isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Also, the content you've been adding is promotional, which goes against Wikipedia's rule on advertising. David1217 What I've done 15:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hong Kong Air Cadet Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply