This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
How is it when I searched for G. G. Fickling, I came up dry? Also, how is it you include Honey West, but not the longer-running Delilah West, created by Maxine O'Callahan in a 1974 ish of AHMM, the longest-running detective series by a woman, and with a woman PI? --squadfifteen, 18/10/05
GG Fickling is a pseudonym for two people. And this is an article about Honey West, not Delilah West. Feel free to create an article about that character if you have the information. 23skidoo18:53, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This section is ridiculously over-long for an article this size. This article is about the print character, yet the print character gets only 77 words, while the "television adaptations" (and why the plural, when there was only one) gets 519 words. This, plus the fact that the TV series already has its own article, is completely absurd.