 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
True advertising edit
Who agrees with me that Playrix should be sued for creating false gameplay in their adverts? It really pisses me off that they make advert gameplay that is completely different from the actual game. I don't want to play Candy Crush nor complete spelling games in order to restore a home, I want to use those actual items in the adverts. Their adverts are disgusting and abysmal, and I'm not just talking about Playrix, I'm talking about the other games in general, such as Words Story, Matchington Mansion and so many more. What was also shocking, a developer had threatened someone on YouTube who exposed their adverts with legal action. It's them who should be facing it. Someone needs to sue them! Who agrees with me? Let's teach Playrix and those other shoddy games a lesson they shall never forget!--Brainiac Adam (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
It's false! This game doesn't have false advertising!!! A proof?