Talk:Homecoming (Kanye West song)/GA1

Latest comment: 2 hours ago by Asilvering in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 21:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk · contribs) This one might take me awhile but based off first glance this looks like a really impressive article. 03:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Impressive lede! CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. I accidentally marked this as on hold earlier but I'm not sure why I did that. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I am going to be breaking this down by section to make it more manageable. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lead: Based off what I've read from the article it seems that all the content in the lead is sourced elsewhere in the article. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Background: Wasn't able to access all the sources but the ones I could verify what was written. No plagiarism issues. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:42, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Writing and development:Wasn't able to access all sources (paywalls) but the ones that I could verify what was written. No plagiarism. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 04:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Recording: "around the same time the rapper was in the studios recording "Impossible" to accompany the 2006 film Mission: Impossible III."

Unless I'm missing here it does not appear that any of your sources back up this claim. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removed --K. Peake 06:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)   DoneReply

"Martin singing into a Neumann U 47"

Source does not appear to back this up however the video wasn't loading on the one source so that could be why. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it is sourced from the video here. --K. Peake 06:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't able to access some of the sources used here (just a heads up [1] is now a dead link but I'll check if I can find an archived version). The sources I could access verified what was written aside from the sections I mentioned above. No plagiarism issues. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Composition and lyrics: [2] currently takes me to a porn site but I'll see if I can find an archived version. [3] is also dead. Because of that parts of "The track is a gospel-inflected jam, featuring an anthemic stadium beat and elements of pub rock." are not verified by source but I'll see if I can find archives. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I now realize that you did archive all the links (thank you), however, quite a few of them are dead now. I started to edit the URL status of some of these links but didn't finish. If you want to you can but it's obviously not required. I did spot-check a couple of refs in this section but I'm going to call it quits for the night and resume my review tomorrow. I'm really impressed with this article so far and look forward to continuing my review. Please point out if I made any mistakes or missed anything while reviewing. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion and release: Spot checks verified all sources. No plagiarism CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Critical reception: Spot checks all verified sources. No plagiarism. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Music video: "The accompanying music video was shot by the acclaimed director Hype Williams and filmed on location in Chicago on November 6, 2007"

The date of filming is supported by the source however there is a video that won't load so that might account for that. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

"It stood among the long history of collaborations between Williams and West, as the two had previously worked together in the past on several music videos, including for those of fellow album tracks "Can't Tell Me Nothing" and "Stronger"."

None of this is supported by the source. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

This supported by the original URL rather than the archive, which is dead so I've now replaced both links! --K. Peake 07:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good! CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 08:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

"The music video features a monochromatic montage of West rapping in a truck and him wandering throughout the many different areas of Chicago, with slow-motion shots and angles highlighting the streets, buildings, monuments and citizens." The one archived source isn't loading for this but assuming you're just describing the music video I think that's fine. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Spot checks supported content, except for the areas highlighted above. No plagiarism. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Commercial performance:

Live performances:

Appearances in media:

Track listing: verified. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk)

Credits and personnel: I couldn't access the source used but all of it seems plausible and in line with what else has been said. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Charts: The Australian Urban didn't match up but I think this is just a reflection of when the link was archived. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Release history: Passed. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 21:28, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  2c. it contains no original research.
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Passed Copyvio check. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 04:52, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). "Despite receiving mixed reviews, "Homecoming" appeared on several retrospective lists of West's best songs. In 2016, Complex listed both the song and the original version "Home" at number 38 among West's 100 best songs."

I wasn't sure whether to put this under 3a or 3b but is there a reason you included the ranking of Home but not Homecoming seeing as the page is about Homecoming? This just seems a bit odd to me. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 18:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Comment: The source says "Homecoming"/"Home" making this a joint ranking; are you suggesting the prose should be re-worded? --K. Peake 07:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Kyle Peake: Just for clarification purposes I would suggest that you reword it to reflect that it is a joint ranking. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 08:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. All images are tagged appropriately. Great use of images throughout the article! CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. I'm not sure if this is the correct place to put this but your caption on the background image ("The façade of Abbey Road Studios, where the song was also recorded as well as West and Martin first met by chance.") doesn't read very smoothly. Something about using "was also" "as well as" and "by chance" all in one sentence seems a bit awkward. Is there some way you could reword this? CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Otherwise all photos are relevant and have suitable captions. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Re-worded the caption to be suitable now. --K. Peake 06:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  7. Overall assessment.

Just a note that @Asilvering: may be dropping by to help out with reviewing the prose. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath (talk) 05:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

asilvering comments

edit

Signatures at the end for your convenience in replying. Feel free to push back against anything you disagree with - very few, if any, of the things I'll mention will individually be worth a GA fail on their own. Any changes too minor to bother you with, I'll just do directly in the article - but feel free to revert or question any of those as well.

  • Lead is too long, imo - three paragraphs would be better. It's not fail-a-GA-over-it too long, so if you've already spent a lot of time tinkering with it and this comment fills you with despair, fine. I don't think all the individual charting positions are necessary, so that's one spot where you could cut quite a bit. -- asilvering (talk) 21:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Prose: ok, I went to do my usual basic prose edits and I'm seeing the same thing come up pretty often, where sentences are in here backwards - that is, the concept that continues in the next sentence isn't placed in the final position of the previous sentence. This makes things jump around a lot. Here's an example:
The song features a guest appearance from Chris Martin and he co-wrote it with West and Warryn Campbell, who served as the producers. West and the singer ... I would rewrite this as: It was written by West and Warryn Campbell, who served as the producers, along with Chris Martin, who makes a guest appearance. West and Martin ...
  • There's also some split sentences, like this one:
West and the singer worked on the song when they met at Abbey Road Studios in February 2006, engaging in a jam session where Martin came up with the concept. Lots of ways to solve this, but one might be: Martin came up with the concept during a jam session with West at Abbey Road Studios in February 2006. Any sentences where you've got two major verbs (eg "worked on", "engaging") or where you've got an "and" in the middle are worth having a second look at.