Talk:Homalanthus populifolius
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move 18 October 2015
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 18 October 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 09:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Omalanthus populifolius → Homalanthus populifolius – The genus "Omalanthus" is now archaic, and "Homalanthus" is now the accepted nomenclature. Reference: James, T.A. & Harden, G.J. (18/10/2015), "Homalanthus populifolius" , in PlantNET - The Plant Information Network System of The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, Australia. http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au Stilts2929 (talk) 06:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support The Plant List concurs. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support, the spelling Homalanthus is conserved against Omalanthus in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (see here). With specific mention in the ICNafp, we have the strongest possible case for using one scientific name over another. Plantdrew (talk) 18:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment please no apostrophes in the page name 73.154.175.89 (talk) 18:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Eliminated apostrophes, 73.154.175.89. George Ho (talk) 05:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.