Talk:Holzwarth gas turbine
 | Holzwarth gas turbine is currently a Computing and engineering good article nominee. Nominated by Stivushka (talk) at 06:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: Early type of gas turbine engine |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Holzwarth gas turbine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Stivushka (talk · contribs) 06:49, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 20:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this shortly! IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Review
edit| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | The lead needs to be expanded and should be a summary of the body meaning it usually does not need citations. See Wikipedia:How to create and manage a good lead section for more guidance. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Holzwarth developed the theoretical concept for his gas turbine in 1905... built a 25 hp (19 kW) machine while working for Thyssen & Co. does not appear to be in the source but I could be wrong. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Ref 4 is 64 pages long. This is too long to not include specific page numbers. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Ref 3 is28 pages long. Again too long to not include page numbers. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | Based on the fact that of 6 sources you used, only 4 of those are online, 2 of those 4 are large documents without page numbers, and my spot checks are not verifying the information present I'm going to have to put this article on hold. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC) |