 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Tense edit
The show "is" (as I told the person who changed it to "was"), creative works "are" unless, for example, they've (all) been destroyed (then they would be "were")
Addendum: I welcome you to get consensus if you wish to change to (the incorrect) past tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the, er, invitation. I already provided a significant amount of evidence on your talk page that the past tense is correct, which you did not refute, and I invite you and any other interested parties to review that. Cheers, DWaterson 18:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, you however provided nothing that would be valid encyclopaedic-ally, unless your denying the creative work *exists* then it is certainly correct to use present tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yet you have provided no evidence to support your assertion. Even WikiProject TV use the past tense, as I demonstrated, indicating considerable consensus from a large number of project members. DWaterson 18:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, you however provided nothing that would be valid encyclopaedic-ally, unless your denying the creative work *exists* then it is certainly correct to use present tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)