Talk:Hoa people in Ho Chi Minh City

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 49.190.240.37 in topic Article in a state of disrepair

Article in a state of disrepair edit

This article is in a state of disrepair. It has no reliable sources nor has it been check for factual accuracy and neutrality. It is yet another one of the many articles about Vietnam that is extremely biased and offensive. Perhaps the article should be nominated for deletion. In any case, there seems to be very little value at all in having this article exist at all. 122.105.147.208 (talk) 13:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's funny how this was even approved in the first place, with no references in it. The user who created this article also is the one that made the anti-Vietnamese sentiment article, which initially also had no references and just blatantly included a whole essay of vietnamphobia. What a troll that guy was. 49.190.240.37 (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoa people in Ho Chi Minh City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply