Talk:Hits (Phil Collins album)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 186.13.43.186 in topic Release year in chronology

Release year in chronology

edit

The release year of this album in the chronology section on the right side appears incorrect and I don't know how to edit this. It should be 1998. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.13.43.186 (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

iTunes "Partial Album"

edit

Track #10, "Both Sides of the Story", does not appear on the iTunes version of the album, which I assume is why the album is only sold per-track (i.e. you cannot buy the whole album). I don't know why that track isn't included, or why the remaining tracks can't be bought as one album. If anyone has some insight, I'd appreciate it. Evanturner 07:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Apparently, that song isn't on the iTunes version of his album "Both Sides", either. Evanturner 07:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Philhits.jpg

edit
 

Image:Philhits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to support move. JPG-GR (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This album is called …Hits. Not sure if there's any technical reason why that can't be used for the article title? Spandrawn (talk)

Perhaps not, but Wikipedia policy is to use common names rather than official names (although of course the two are often the same). The preferred name is not automatically the one that the artist gave it, particularly in the case of affected or unusual punctuation such as this. See particularly Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Album and song titles and band names.
To justify the move, we'd at least need evidence that the common name also includes the ellipsis, and even then the current policy could be interpretted as discouraging using it in the article name. Andrewa (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Another Day in Paradise playing time

edit

Both on the Wikipedia-page and on the album cover it says: Another Day in Paradise" (Phil Collins) – 6:20 but my cd player says 5.22, and I've no reason to believe it's wrong. Is it a typo on the album cover? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.211.50.17 (talk) 10:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I am wondering the same. Must be a typo, no? --Alexander (talk) 04:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hits (Phil Collins album)...Hits

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Hits (Phil Collins album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hits (Phil Collins album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply