Talk:Hit-and-run tactics

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Generalize? edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi

I was just thinking... since the term hit-and-run is a polysemy, I wonder which one we may need to rewrite, this article or its disambiguation page, so that the idea of hit-and-run as a tactic in multiple fields can be covered. Thanks.

Actually, most of the examples given would be much more accurately described as feigned retreat. Looks like the author got a little carried away here... --Latebird (talk) 14:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Economics and Military? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I appreciate that there may not be a enough material to create an individual article for each of these topic at this present moment, but this should really be a disambiguation and not on the same page. We can't put the military doctrine and economics in the same place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.220.177 (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic