Talk:History of the M1 Abrams

Move

I would endorse moving this page to Combat history of the M1 Abrams and moving information from M1 Abrams#Combat history to hereusername 1 (talk) 21:26, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Iraq War

the article which is sourced clearly means that the 80 tanks hit by enemy tanks were sent back to the states for repair, I changed it to say something to the lines of that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.69.238 (talk) 17:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I found two sentences that contradict each other. In the Gulf War Section, 2nd paragraph there is this sentence. "Only 23 M1A1s were taken out of service in the Gulf[2] and one of these losses resulted in crew deaths from Iraqi fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness. Very few Abrams tanks were hit by enemy fire, and there was only one fatality, along with a handful of woundings as a result."

Then goto the Iraq War Section paragraph 2 and there is this sentence. "However, on October 29, 2003, two soldiers were killed and a third wounded when their tank was disabled by an anti-tank mine, which was combined with other explosives (500 kg (1,100 lb), including several 155 mm rounds) to increase its effect. The massive explosion beneath the tank knocked off the turret. This marked the first time deaths resulted from a hostile-fire assault on the M1 tank from enemy forces."

They contradict each other. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.94.118 (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Gulf War is 1990, Iraq War is 2003. (Hohum ^@) 00:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the M1 Abrams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120910022204/http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/09/marine_abrams_092709w/ to http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2009/09/marine_abrams_092709w/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2013/October/Pages/OverArmyObjections,IndustryandCongressPartnertoKeepAbramsTankProduction'Hot'.aspx
• Added archive https://archive.is/20141224171838/http://www.armyrecognition.com/december_2014_global_defense_security_news_uk/new_120_million_upgrade_program_for_the_us_m1_abrams_main_battle_tank_1212142.html to http://www.armyrecognition.com/december_2014_global_defense_security_news_uk/new_120_million_upgrade_program_for_the_us_m1_abrams_main_battle_tank_1212142.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)