Talk:History of the Jews in Mauritius/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 17:01, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "because they were denied entry to Palestine by the British Government for not having entry permits.[1]" -> For me the last part conveys the same meaning as the first part; they were denied because they were not permitted to enter is the same. Do you know why they were denied? I can think why but if you don't find any useful information I propose to delete the last part of this sentence. --GoP_T^C_N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

   Removed last part. -- BCS (t · c · !) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref 2 says 127, not 128.--GoP_T^C_N 11:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

   Changed. -- BCS (t · c · !) 20:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The author of the picture is needed. If you don't know the name then simply write that the author is unknown

   Fixed. -- BCS (t · c · !) 21:25, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

7. Overall: On hold

   Pass/Fail: