Wikipedia

Talk:History of the Caribbean/Archive 1

< Talk:History of the Caribbean
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Archive 1

history stubs

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

also, even if they've already been started and are no longer red links, several of them are still marked as stubs. --Doviende 17:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

American spelling

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It's an article about the Carribean, so I assumed the liberty of replacing "centre" with "center". This works, no? Matt Yeager 02:11, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

No. Caribbean English spells it "centre". Guettarda 02:18, 28 September 2005 (UTC)


Red Links

Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

please use <s> and </s> when links are fixed

If someone with more relavant knowledge could make some stubs as part of CotW this would be helpful. Olleicua 13:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Definition of Caribbean

Latest comment: 18 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Someone just removed History of Guyana and History of French Guiana from the "History of individual Caribbean Islands and Nations" list. While these two places are not technically part of the Caribbean, their histories are closely linked to the Caribbean and indeed mentioned in the Caribbean article and Portal:Caribbean. I think that we should leave them on the list, or perhaps a different section called "History of other countries which are related to the Caribbean by geography or culture". What do people think?--Kewp (t) 10:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

No reason not to revert the change. Done. Guettarda 12:54, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
I just removed them because they aren't in the Carribean (are they closely related ? Yes, but the definition of the paragraph is History of individual Caribbean Nations, so the title has either to be changed or them to be removed).
Furthermore, the word Nations is misused. Martinique and Guadeloupe are obviously not nations (you will never heard in French someone talking about la nation martiniquaise (the Nation from Martinique). Poppypetty 07:25, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
I think that we should keep Poppypetty's change to "History of individual Caribbean Islands and Nations," but keep French Guiana and Guyana as they can be considered "Caribbean" in some ways, Guyana is easy since it's a country but French Guiana is a French département d'outre-mer which would be more difficult to include under "Islands and Nations". We could add a footnote, however if people thought that it was unclear. --Kewp (t) 14:52, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
I'd say neither "islands" nor "nations" are ideal. We aren't talking about the history of Cariacou, or St John or Chacachacare. We don't even have a separate article on the history of Tobago. We need a better term. Guettarda 16:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Well this is a little weaselly, but how about "History of individual places in the Caribbean" or "History of selected individual places in the Caribbean"? "Selected histories of individual places in the the Caribbean." Is there any word that's slightly less vague than "places" though? lands? political entities? I don't know....--Kewp (t) 17:47, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
What about History of Carribean territories ? Not perfect I agree. Poppypetty 02:02, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
"Territories" sounds good to me - Guettarda 02:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Me, too. I'll make the change, then? --Kewp (t) 11:01, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I changed History to Histories: "Histories of individual Caribbean territories," it sounded better to me since there are multiple histories. Hope this is okay.--Kewp (t) 11:07, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Michener's book

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't think that we do very much for our credibility when we list a work of fiction as one of two references for this article. I would like to suggest that we ditch it. Anyone opposed? Guettarda 03:36, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Viking etc.

"Christopher Columbus was the first European explorer to travel to the Americas, but soon afterward both Portuguese and Spanish ships began claiming territories in Central and South America." I think a mention should at least be made of the theories of early travelling the Americas, as is in the history of america article.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of the Caribbean/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The section on The Caribbean Before European Contact has been violated. Read it and you will see what I mean. I don't know enough to begin fixing it myself.

Last edited at 01:04, 30 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Slave Rebellions

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Organizationally speaking, wouldn't it make sense to make the section on Slave Rebellions a subcategory of Slaves in the Caribbean?Dbrahms (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Caribbean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Caribbean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_the_Caribbean/Archive_1&oldid=1007633355"